Prompt engineering for text generation: Difference between revisions

Line 220: Line 220:
Several techniques have been proposed to improve the accuracy and effectiveness of CoT prompting:
Several techniques have been proposed to improve the accuracy and effectiveness of CoT prompting:


*[[Self-consistency sampling]], as suggested by Wang et al. (2022a), can improve reasoning accuracy by sampling a number of diverse answers and taking the majority vote.
*[[Self-consistency sampling]], as suggested by Wang et al. (2022a), can improve reasoning accuracy by sampling a number of diverse answers and taking the majority vote.<ref name="”118”"></ref>
*Wang et al. (2022b) proposed using ensemble learning by altering the example order or replacing human-written rationales with model-generated ones, introducing randomness during multiple sample trials. Model outputs can then be aggregated using a majority vote to obtain the final answer.
*Wang et al. (2022b) proposed using ensemble learning by altering the example order or replacing human-written rationales with model-generated ones, introducing randomness during multiple sample trials. Model outputs can then be aggregated using a majority vote to obtain the final answer.
*If training examples only have true answers but no rationales, the STaR (Self-Taught Reasoner) method by Zelikman et al. (2022) can be followed: (1) ask the model to generate reasoning chains and keep only those leading to correct answers; (2) fine-tune the model with generated rationales and repeat the process until convergence. Higher temperature settings are more likely to generate incorrect rationales with correct answers.
*If training examples only have true answers but no rationales, the STaR (Self-Taught Reasoner) method by Zelikman et al. (2022) can be followed: (1) ask the model to generate reasoning chains and keep only those leading to correct answers; (2) fine-tune the model with generated rationales and repeat the process until convergence. Higher temperature settings are more likely to generate incorrect rationales with correct answers.
370

edits