Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), Suppressors, Administrators
7,979
edits
Minimum Viable Agent: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| (7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{stub}} | |||
{{see also|Artificial intelligence terms}} | |||
[[Minimum Viable Agent]] or '''MVA''' is a streamlined, initial version of an [[AI agent]] designed to solve a single, specific problem with minimal features while delivering significant value to users. Inspired by the concepts of [[Minimum Viable Product]] (MVP) and Minimum Viable Service, the MVA approach emphasizes simplicity, rapid development, and real-world testing over complex, feature-heavy designs. The goal is to create an agent functional enough to gather feedback, demonstrate utility, and evolve based on user needs—without the pitfalls of over-engineering or scope creep. | [[Minimum Viable Agent]] or '''MVA''' is a streamlined, initial version of an [[AI agent]] designed to solve a single, specific problem with minimal features while delivering significant value to users. Inspired by the concepts of [[Minimum Viable Product]] (MVP) and Minimum Viable Service, the MVA approach emphasizes simplicity, rapid development, and real-world testing over complex, feature-heavy designs. The goal is to create an agent functional enough to gather feedback, demonstrate utility, and evolve based on user needs—without the pitfalls of over-engineering or scope creep. | ||
| Line 22: | Line 24: | ||
These agents don’t need advanced capabilities like deep [[Natural Language Processing|NLP]] or full automation at first. Instead, they often rely on a "[[Human-in-the-Loop]]" approach, where human oversight compensates for limitations while the system learns. | These agents don’t need advanced capabilities like deep [[Natural Language Processing|NLP]] or full automation at first. Instead, they often rely on a "[[Human-in-the-Loop]]" approach, where human oversight compensates for limitations while the system learns. | ||
== Lessons from Implementation == | ==Lessons from Implementation== | ||
Developers who’ve built MVAs highlight several recurring lessons: | Developers who’ve built MVAs highlight several recurring lessons: | ||
* | *'''Avoid Overbuilding''': Adding too many features early on wastes effort when user needs shift. | ||
* | *'''Launch Early''': Waiting for a "perfect" agent delays feedback, which is critical for improvement. Successful cases like [[ChatGPT]] started basic and scaled rapidly. | ||
* | *'''Monitor Usage''': Tracking interactions—via logs, surveys, or tools like [[OpenTelemetry]]—reveals what works and what fails. | ||
* | *'''Charge Sooner''': Offering the agent free for too long can undervalue it; even a small fee identifies committed users. | ||
* | *'''Differentiate Early''': In a crowded AI market, a unique value proposition sets the MVA apart. | ||
Common pitfalls include over-engineering, neglecting user feedback, and underestimating maintenance needs (e.g., model drift), all of which can derail progress if ignored | Common pitfalls include over-engineering, neglecting user feedback, and underestimating maintenance needs (e.g., model drift), all of which can derail progress if ignored. | ||
== Tools and Frameworks == | == Tools and Frameworks == | ||
Building an MVA doesn’t require starting from scratch. Developers often rely on: | Building an MVA doesn’t require starting from scratch. Developers often rely on: | ||
* | *'''Frameworks''': [[N8N]], [[Flowise]], [[PydanticAI]], [[smolagents]], [[LangGraph]]—tools for rapid workflow assembly and integration. | ||
* | *'''Models''': [[Groq]], [[OpenAI]], [[Cline]], [[DeepSeek R1]], [[Qwen-Coder-2.5]]—popular choices for language and task-specific capabilities. | ||
* | *'''Coding Aids''': [[GitHub Copilot]], [[Windsurf]], [[Cursor]], [[Bolt.new]]—assistants that accelerate development with code suggestions. | ||
These tools | These tools enable quick prototyping, letting creators focus on the agent’s purpose rather than its technical underpinnings. | ||
==Advantages and Limitations== | ==Advantages and Limitations== | ||
| Line 54: | Line 55: | ||
==Business Potential== | ==Business Potential== | ||
An MVA | An MVA isn't just a proof-of-concept. It's a stepping stone to a viable business. Early adopters can refine the agent's value proposition, differentiate it in a crowded market, and tailor it to specific industries or clients. Testimonials from initial users bolster credibility, while customization options (e.g. integrating with a company's database) enhance appeal. The challenge is balancing simplicity with enough utility to justify a price tag, whether through subscriptions, pay-per-use, or premium tiers. | ||
==Philosophy and Broader Impact== | ==Philosophy and Broader Impact== | ||
The MVA approach mirrors broader trends in tech: ship fast, learn from users, and adapt. It rejects the notion that AI must be flawless out of the | The MVA approach mirrors broader trends in tech: ship fast, learn from users, and adapt. It rejects the notion that AI must be flawless out of the gate, a mindset fueling successes like [[Google]]'s evolving algorithms and [[OpenAI]]'s iterative models. By keeping humans involved and updates frequent, MVAs stay relevant in a field where stagnation means obsolescence. It’s about momentum over perfection, a pragmatic way for developers, startups, and businesses to explore AI without drowning in complexity. | ||
{{stub}} | |||
[[Category:Terms]] [[Category:Artificial intelligence terms]] | |||