Midpage caselaw (ChatGPT Plugin): Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - "|300px]]" to "") |
No edit summary |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Plugin infobox | {{Plugin infobox | ||
|image = | |image = midpage caselaw.png | ||
|Name = midpage caselaw | |Name = midpage caselaw | ||
|Platform = ChatGPT | |Platform = ChatGPT | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|Free = | |Free = | ||
|Price = | |Price = | ||
|Available = | |Available = Yes | ||
|Working = Yes | |||
}} | }} | ||
==Guide== | ==Guide== | ||
===Example Prompts=== | ===Example Prompts=== | ||
Example prompts that utilize the plugin: | Example prompts that utilize the plugin: | ||
#Verify the legal proposition 'A breach of contract occurs when one party fails to perform its obligations, as stated in RST Corp. v. UVW Inc., 345 F.3d 678 (S.D.N.Y 2007)' using the cited case. | |||
#Retrieve the full text of the case 'EFG Corp. v. HIJ Inc., 567 F.3d 231 (S.D.N.Y 2010)' and provide relevant quotes discussing 'implied-in-fact contracts'. | |||
#Assess the accuracy of the statement 'Statute of limitations applies to all civil actions, as established in KLM Corp. v. NOP Inc., 765 F.4d 543 (S.D.N.Y 2011)' based on the cited case. | |||
#Provide verbatim quotes from the case 'QRS Corp. v. TUV Inc., 998 F.3d 470 (S.D.N.Y 2012)' that discuss the concept of 'fiduciary duty'. | |||
#Check if the legal proposition 'In employment law, the at-will employment doctrine allows employers to terminate employees without cause, as per WXY Corp. v. ZAB Inc., 345 F.3d 678 (S.D.N.Y 2013)' is accurate based on the cited case. | |||
#Access the full text of the case 'CDE Corp. v. FGH Inc., 665 F.3d 432 (S.D.N.Y 2014)' and extract relevant quotes about the First Amendment and freedom of speech. | |||
#Verify the statement 'The doctrine of laches applies in intellectual property cases, as stated in NOP Corp. v. QRS Inc., 687 F.3d 741 (S.D.N.Y 2018)' using the cited case. | |||
#Retrieve the full text of the case 'TUV Corp. v. WXY Inc., 231 F.3d 432 (S.D.N.Y 2019)' and provide quotes that discuss the 'best interests of the child' standard in custody cases. | |||
#Assess the accuracy of the proposition 'In tort law, the concept of contributory negligence can reduce or eliminate the plaintiff's recovery, as established in HIJ Corp. v. KLM Inc., 543 F.3d 689 (S.D.N.Y 2020)' based on the cited case. | |||
#Provide verbatim quotes from the case 'ZAB Corp. v. CDE Inc., 136 F.3d 452 (S.D.N.Y 2021)' that discuss the concept of 'constructive fraud'. | |||
==Tips and Tricks== | ==Tips and Tricks== | ||
==Comments== | ==Comments== | ||
<Comments /> | <Comments /> | ||
Latest revision as of 01:21, 24 June 2023
| Midpage caselaw (ChatGPT Plugin) | |
|---|---|
| |
| Information | |
| Name | midpage caselaw |
| Platform | ChatGPT |
| Model | GPT-4 |
| Category | Legal |
| Description | Interact with US caselaw: Summarizes text, answers questions, and checks legal statements. |
| Release Date | June 10, 2023 |
| Available | Yes |
| Working | Yes |
midpage caselaw is a Plugin for ChatGPT.
Guide
Example Prompts
Example prompts that utilize the plugin:
- Verify the legal proposition 'A breach of contract occurs when one party fails to perform its obligations, as stated in RST Corp. v. UVW Inc., 345 F.3d 678 (S.D.N.Y 2007)' using the cited case.
- Retrieve the full text of the case 'EFG Corp. v. HIJ Inc., 567 F.3d 231 (S.D.N.Y 2010)' and provide relevant quotes discussing 'implied-in-fact contracts'.
- Assess the accuracy of the statement 'Statute of limitations applies to all civil actions, as established in KLM Corp. v. NOP Inc., 765 F.4d 543 (S.D.N.Y 2011)' based on the cited case.
- Provide verbatim quotes from the case 'QRS Corp. v. TUV Inc., 998 F.3d 470 (S.D.N.Y 2012)' that discuss the concept of 'fiduciary duty'.
- Check if the legal proposition 'In employment law, the at-will employment doctrine allows employers to terminate employees without cause, as per WXY Corp. v. ZAB Inc., 345 F.3d 678 (S.D.N.Y 2013)' is accurate based on the cited case.
- Access the full text of the case 'CDE Corp. v. FGH Inc., 665 F.3d 432 (S.D.N.Y 2014)' and extract relevant quotes about the First Amendment and freedom of speech.
- Verify the statement 'The doctrine of laches applies in intellectual property cases, as stated in NOP Corp. v. QRS Inc., 687 F.3d 741 (S.D.N.Y 2018)' using the cited case.
- Retrieve the full text of the case 'TUV Corp. v. WXY Inc., 231 F.3d 432 (S.D.N.Y 2019)' and provide quotes that discuss the 'best interests of the child' standard in custody cases.
- Assess the accuracy of the proposition 'In tort law, the concept of contributory negligence can reduce or eliminate the plaintiff's recovery, as established in HIJ Corp. v. KLM Inc., 543 F.3d 689 (S.D.N.Y 2020)' based on the cited case.
- Provide verbatim quotes from the case 'ZAB Corp. v. CDE Inc., 136 F.3d 452 (S.D.N.Y 2021)' that discuss the concept of 'constructive fraud'.
Tips and Tricks
Comments
Loading comments...