Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), Suppressors, Administrators
7,785
edits
ChatGPT: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
PauloPacheco (talk | contribs) (Created page with "thumb|Figure 1: ChatGPT user interface. Source: OpenAI. Developed by the AI research lab OpenAI, ChatGPT is a large language model (LLM) that generates text based on an input (prompt) from a user (figure 1). It interacts in a conversational way, answering follow-up questions, admitting to its mistakes, refusing inappropriate requests, and challenging incorrect premises. <ref name="”1”">OpenAI (2022). ChatGPT: Optimizing...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{see also|ChaGPT Guides}} | |||
==Introduction== | |||
[[File:Gpt4-122.jpg|thumb|Figure 1: ChatGPT user interface. Source: OpenAI.]] | [[File:Gpt4-122.jpg|thumb|Figure 1: ChatGPT user interface. Source: OpenAI.]] | ||
Developed by the [[AI]] research lab [[OpenAI]], ChatGPT is a [[large language model]] ([[LLM]]) that generates text based on an [[input]] ([[prompt]]) from a user (figure 1). It interacts in a conversational way, answering follow-up questions, admitting to its mistakes, refusing inappropriate requests, and challenging incorrect premises. <ref name="”1”">OpenAI (2022). ChatGPT: Optimizing language models for dialogue. OpenAI. https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt/</ref> <ref name="”2”">Kelly, SM (2022). This AI chatbot is dominating social media with its frighteningly good essays. CNN International. https://edition.cnn.com/2022/12/05/tech/chatgpt-trnd/index.html</ref> <ref name="”3”">Edwards, B (2022). No Linux? No problem. Just get AI to hallucinate it for you. Ars Technica. https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2022/12/openais-new-chatbot-can-hallucinate-a-linux-shell-or-calling-a-bbs/</ref> The LLM was trained on a massive amount of information <ref name="”2”" /> and it's a derivative of [[InstructGPT]], a program trained to follow natural language instructions in a prompt and give an elaborate response. <ref name="”1”" /> | Developed by the [[AI]] research lab [[OpenAI]], ChatGPT is a [[large language model]] ([[LLM]]) that generates text based on an [[input]] ([[prompt]]) from a user (figure 1). It interacts in a conversational way, answering follow-up questions, admitting to its mistakes, refusing inappropriate requests, and challenging incorrect premises. <ref name="”1”">OpenAI (2022). ChatGPT: Optimizing language models for dialogue. OpenAI. https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt/</ref> <ref name="”2”">Kelly, SM (2022). This AI chatbot is dominating social media with its frighteningly good essays. CNN International. https://edition.cnn.com/2022/12/05/tech/chatgpt-trnd/index.html</ref> <ref name="”3”">Edwards, B (2022). No Linux? No problem. Just get AI to hallucinate it for you. Ars Technica. https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2022/12/openais-new-chatbot-can-hallucinate-a-linux-shell-or-calling-a-bbs/</ref> The LLM was trained on a massive amount of information <ref name="”2”" /> and it's a derivative of [[InstructGPT]], a program trained to follow natural language instructions in a prompt and give an elaborate response. <ref name="”1”" /> | ||
| Line 64: | Line 65: | ||
==Implications== | ==Implications== | ||
The impact of such [[AI models]] is potentially enormous. Like other [[content-generation applications]] (e.g. [[DALL-E]] and [[Midjourney]]) it affects the human element that, until now, has been responsible for the production of text or art. It could mean the end of white-collar knowledge work. <ref name="”4”" /> <ref name="”7”" /> Also, copyright issues are another problem that will arise. In education, homework and essays will not be a reliable way to evaluate students. AI-assisted tools keep evolving and will provide an easier way to plagiarize. <ref name="”9”" /> In the future, tools like OpenAI's ChatGPT could be used as propaganda machines, flooding the public with authoritative-sounding information. <ref name="”10”">Fried, I (2022). New AI chatbot is scary good. Axios. https://www.axios.com/2022/12/05/chatgpt-scary-good-ai-chatbot</ref> | The impact of such [[AI models]] is potentially enormous. Like other [[content-generation applications]] (e.g. [[DALL-E]] and [[Midjourney]]) it affects the human element that, until now, has been responsible for the production of text or art. It could mean the end of white-collar knowledge work. <ref name="”4”" /> <ref name="”7”" /> Also, copyright issues are another problem that will arise. In education, homework and essays will not be a reliable way to evaluate students. AI-assisted tools keep evolving and will provide an easier way to plagiarize. <ref name="”9”" /> In the future, tools like OpenAI's ChatGPT could be used as propaganda machines, flooding the public with authoritative-sounding information. <ref name="”10”">Fried, I (2022). New AI chatbot is scary good. Axios. https://www.axios.com/2022/12/05/chatgpt-scary-good-ai-chatbot</ref> | ||