COLLIE

From AI Wiki


COLLIE
Overview
Full name Systematic Construction of Constrained Text Generation Tasks
Abbreviation COLLIE
Description A grammar-based framework for systematic construction of complex constrained text generation tasks
Release date 2023-07-17
Latest version v1
Benchmark updated 2024-03
Authors Shunyu YaoHoward ChenAustin W. HanjieRunzhe YangKarthik Narasimhan
Organization Princeton NLP
Technical Details
Type Constrained Text GenerationCompositional Reasoning
Modality Text
Task format Constraint-based text generation
Number of tasks 13 constraint structures
Total examples 2,080
Evaluation metric Constraint satisfaction checking
Domains Language understandingLogical reasoningCountingSemantic planning
Languages English
Performance
Human performance Not specified
Baseline Varies by constraint type
SOTA score Not publicly reported
SOTA model Evaluation ongoing
SOTA date 2024
Saturated No
Resources
Website Official website
Paper Paper
GitHub Repository
Dataset Download
License MIT (code), various (data sources)



COLLIE (Systematic Construction of Constrained Text Generation Tasks) is a benchmark framework designed to evaluate large language models' ability to generate text that satisfies complex, compositional constraints. Released on July 17, 2023, by researchers from Princeton NLP[1], COLLIE addresses the limitation that existing constrained text generation benchmarks have become too easy for advanced models like GPT-4. The framework introduces a grammar-based approach that allows systematic creation of diverse constraint types across multiple linguistic levels, from word-level to passage-level requirements.

Overview

COLLIE represents a paradigm shift in evaluating constrained text generation capabilities. Unlike traditional benchmarks that rely on fixed, simple constraints such as keyword inclusion or sentiment requirements, COLLIE provides a flexible grammar-based framework that can generate arbitrarily complex, compositional constraints. This approach enables researchers to create challenging tasks that test multiple cognitive abilities simultaneously, including language understanding, logical reasoning, counting, and semantic planning[1].

The benchmark's design philosophy centers on the observation that current language models have largely solved simple constraint satisfaction tasks, necessitating more sophisticated evaluation methods. By enabling the systematic construction of multi-level constraints that can be combined in various ways, COLLIE provides a scalable approach to benchmark creation that can evolve alongside improving model capabilities.

Significance

COLLIE's importance in the field of AI evaluation stems from several key contributions:

  • **Compositional Complexity**: Introduces multi-level, compositional constraints that go beyond simple word inclusion
  • **Systematic Framework**: Provides a grammar-based system for generating diverse constraint types
  • **Extensibility**: Designed to be easily extended with new constraint types as models improve
  • **Automatic Task Generation**: Can automatically extract task instances from raw text corpora
  • **Cognitive Diversity**: Tests multiple cognitive abilities through varied constraint combinations

Framework Architecture

Core Components

COLLIE's architecture consists of five fundamental classes that work together to create complex constraints[2]:

Component Description Example Usage
**Level** Defines the linguistic scope of constraints Word, Sentence, Paragraph, Passage
**Transformation** Modifies text elements Capitalization, reversal, substitution
**Logic** Combines multiple constraints AND, OR, NOT operations
**Relation** Establishes relationships between elements Ordering, proximity, dependency
**Reduction** Aggregates constraint evaluations Count, percentage, threshold checks

Constraint Levels

The framework operates across four distinct linguistic levels:

Level Scope Example Constraints
**Word Level** Individual tokens Specific word inclusion, exclusion, frequency
**Sentence Level** Complete sentences Sentence structure, length, complexity
**Paragraph Level** Multiple sentences Topic coherence, transition requirements
**Passage Level** Entire text Overall structure, theme consistency

Dataset Structure

COLLIE-v1 Dataset

The first version of COLLIE includes a carefully curated dataset[1]:

Aspect Specification
**Total Instances** 2,080
**Constraint Structures** 13 distinct types
**Data Sources** Project Gutenberg, Wikipedia
**Storage Format** Python pickle (.dill)
**File Location** data/all_data.dill

Constraint Categories

The 13 constraint structures in COLLIE-v1 cover diverse linguistic and cognitive challenges:

Category Constraint Types Cognitive Skills Tested
**Lexical** Word inclusion/exclusion, vocabulary restrictions Vocabulary control, semantic understanding
**Syntactic** Grammar patterns, sentence structures Syntactic knowledge, grammatical reasoning
**Semantic** Topic adherence, meaning preservation Semantic understanding, conceptual reasoning
**Logical** Conditional requirements, boolean operations Logical reasoning, rule following
**Numerical** Word counts, frequency requirements Counting, numerical reasoning
**Structural** Format requirements, organization patterns Planning, structural reasoning

Evaluation Methodology

Four-Step Pipeline

COLLIE employs a systematic evaluation pipeline[1]:

Step Process Description
**1. Constraint Specification** Define requirements Create complex constraints using the grammar framework
**2. Example Extraction** Gather instances Automatically extract qualifying examples from text corpora
**3. Instruction Rendering** Generate prompts Convert constraints to natural language instructions
**4. Generation & Evaluation** Test models Generate text and verify constraint satisfaction

Constraint Checking

The evaluation system uses automated checking mechanisms:

```python

  1. Example constraint checking process

constraint = CompositeConstraint(

   word_level=["include 'science'", "exclude 'fiction'"],
   sentence_level=["max_length: 20"],
   logic="AND"

) result = check_constraint(generated_text, constraint) ```

Scoring Methodology

Models are evaluated on:

  • **Constraint Satisfaction Rate**: Percentage of constraints successfully met
  • **Partial Credit**: Some constraints allow partial satisfaction scoring
  • **Complexity Scaling**: Performance across increasing constraint complexity levels

Model Performance

Tested Models

COLLIE has been used to evaluate five state-of-the-art instruction-tuned language models[3]:

Model Category Characteristics Performance Trends
**Large-scale LLMs** GPT-4 class models Better at complex constraints but still show failures
**Instruction-tuned Models** Fine-tuned on instructions Improved constraint following but struggle with composition
**Open-source Models** Community models Variable performance, often fail on multi-level constraints

Performance Insights

Key findings from COLLIE evaluations reveal:

  • **Complexity Gap**: Performance degrades significantly with constraint complexity
  • **Compositional Challenges**: Models struggle with multiple simultaneous constraints
  • **Level-dependent Performance**: Word-level constraints easier than passage-level
  • **Logical Operations**: Boolean combinations particularly challenging

Technical Implementation

Installation and Setup

COLLIE provides a Python package for easy integration[2]:

Requirement Specification
**Python Version** 3.9 recommended (compatibility issues with 3.10+)
**Installation** `pip install collie-bench` or `pip install -e .` from repository
**Dependencies** NumPy, PyTorch, Transformers
**Memory Requirements** Varies by model size

Usage Example

Basic usage pattern for COLLIE:

```python from collie import ConstraintGenerator, Evaluator

  1. Define constraints

generator = ConstraintGenerator() constraints = generator.create_composite_constraint(

   levels=['word', 'sentence'],
   types=['inclusion', 'length']

)

  1. Evaluate model

evaluator = Evaluator() results = evaluator.evaluate_model(

   model_name="gpt-4",
   constraints=constraints,
   test_instances=test_data

) ```

Research Applications

Current Research Directions

COLLIE enables several research areas:

Research Area Application Impact
**Controllable Generation** Developing better constraint-following models Improved text generation control
**Prompt Engineering** Optimizing constraint instructions Better model instruction following
**Cognitive Evaluation** Testing specific reasoning abilities Understanding model limitations
**Benchmark Design** Creating new evaluation tasks Advancing evaluation methodology

Community Contributions

The framework encourages community involvement through:

  • **Custom Constraint Development**: Researchers can add new constraint types
  • **Dataset Expansion**: Additional text sources can be incorporated
  • **Model Submissions**: Community can evaluate new models
  • **Methodology Improvements**: Framework extensions and optimizations

Limitations and Future Work

Current Limitations

Limitation Description Impact
**English-only** Currently limited to English text Reduces global applicability
**Text Modality** No multimodal constraints Misses vision-language interactions
**Static Constraints** Pre-defined constraint types May not capture all generation aspects
**Computational Cost** Complex constraints expensive to check Limits large-scale evaluation

Future Directions

Potential extensions and improvements include:

1. **Multilingual Support**: Extending to multiple languages 2. **Dynamic Constraints**: Constraints that adapt during generation 3. **Multimodal Extensions**: Incorporating image and audio constraints 4. **Human Evaluation**: Comparing automated checks with human judgments 5. **Real-world Applications**: Applying to practical generation tasks

Impact on the Field

Advancing Constrained Generation

COLLIE has influenced the field by:

  • **Raising Standards**: Establishing need for complex constraint evaluation
  • **Systematic Approach**: Providing grammar-based framework for task creation
  • **Revealing Limitations**: Exposing weaknesses in current models
  • **Driving Innovation**: Spurring development of better constraint-following techniques

Related Benchmarks

Benchmark Focus Relation to COLLIE
CommonGen Commonsense generation Simpler, fixed constraints
ROCStories Story generation Narrative constraints only
KILT Knowledge-intensive tasks Different constraint types
TextWorld Interactive fiction Game-based constraints

Significance

COLLIE represents a crucial advancement in evaluating language models' ability to follow complex, compositional constraints during text generation. By providing a systematic, grammar-based framework for creating diverse constraint types, it addresses the limitation that existing benchmarks have become too easy for modern language models. The benchmark's extensible design ensures it can evolve alongside improving model capabilities, while its multi-level constraint system reveals important limitations in current models' ability to satisfy complex, compositional requirements.

The framework's emphasis on automatic task generation and systematic constraint construction provides a scalable approach to benchmark creation that can adapt to future developments in AI. As language models continue to improve, COLLIE's flexible architecture ensures it will remain relevant for evaluating increasingly sophisticated constraint-following capabilities, making it an essential tool for advancing controllable text generation research.

See Also

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Yao, S., Chen, H., Hanjie, A. W., Yang, R., & Narasimhan, K. (2023). "COLLIE: Systematic Construction of Constrained Text Generation Tasks". arXiv:2307.08689. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.08689
  2. 2.0 2.1 Princeton NLP. (2023). "COLLIE: Constrained Text Generation Benchmark". GitHub. Retrieved from https://github.com/princeton-nlp/Collie
  3. Yao, S., et al. (2024). "COLLIE: Systematic Construction of Constrained Text Generation Tasks". ICLR 2024 Proceedings.