ICML

23 min read
Updated
Suggest editHistoryTalk
RawGraph

Last edited

Fact-checked

In review queue

Sources

28 citations

Revision

v3 · 4,570 words

Fact-checks are independent of edits: a reviewer re-verifies the article against its sources and stamps the date. How we verify

ICML, the International Conference on Machine Learning, is one of the three top-tier academic conferences in machine learning, alongside NeurIPS and ICLR, and is organized annually by the International Machine Learning Society (IMLS). It grew out of an informal workshop series first held at Carnegie Mellon University in 1980 and has since become one of the largest gatherings in artificial intelligence: ICML 2025 in Vancouver drew 12,107 paper submissions and accepted 3,260 of them, a 26.9 percent acceptance rate [1][2][9]. The conference publishes its proceedings open access through the Proceedings of Machine Learning Research (PMLR) [3].

ICML covers the full breadth of machine learning research, including supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement learning, statistical learning theory, optimization for ML, probabilistic models, kernel methods, deep learning, representation learning, and the interfaces with natural language processing, computer vision, robotics, and computational biology. Proceedings have been published open access since 2010 through the Proceedings of Machine Learning Research (PMLR) [3]. The official ICML 2026 Call for Papers describes the venue as a home for "original and rigorous research of significant interest to the machine learning community" [26].

History

Origins as a workshop (1980 to 1987)

The lineage of ICML traces back to the first International Workshop on Machine Learning (IWML), held in July 1980 at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh. The 1980 workshop was organized by Ryszard S. Michalski, Jaime Carbonell, and Tom M. Mitchell, three figures who would go on to edit the foundational Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach book series that helped define machine learning as a coherent subfield distinct from broader artificial intelligence [1][4]. The workshop format continued through the 1980s, with subsequent meetings in 1983 (Monticello, Illinois), 1985 (Skytop, Pennsylvania), and 1987 (Irvine, California). These were intimate gatherings of a few dozen to a few hundred attendees, with proceedings often published as edited volumes.

Transition to a conference (1988 onward)

ICML adopted the conference name and numbering scheme starting with the 5th International Conference on Machine Learning in 1988, held in Ann Arbor, Michigan. The numbering reflects continuity with the four prior workshops [1]. The 1993 edition at the University of Massachusetts Amherst is sometimes cited as the point at which ICML solidified its modern conference format with refereed proceedings, although the conference designation had begun in 1988 [1].

Founding of the IMLS (2001 to 2002)

For most of its early history, ICML was run informally, with each year's host institution managing logistics independently. At the ICML 2001 business meeting in Williamstown, Massachusetts, attendees approved the creation of a democratic governance structure, and the International Machine Learning Society (IMLS) was established as a non-profit organization in 2001, with formal incorporation completed shortly thereafter [5][6]. The IMLS now governs ICML, manages the conference finances, and oversees affiliated publishing efforts. The IMLS is distinct from the Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation, which separately governs NeurIPS.

Growth in the 2010s and 2020s

The rise of deep learning after 2012 transformed ICML from a moderately sized academic conference into one of the largest events in computer science. Submissions roughly doubled every few years through the 2010s: the conference received 1,037 submissions in 2015 and 12,107 in 2025, more than an elevenfold increase in a decade [9][10]. The conference also expanded to include extensive workshop and tutorial tracks, and by the mid-2020s ICML had become a major commercial as well as academic event, with sponsorship from industry research labs playing a substantial role [2].

Format

A typical modern ICML runs for five to seven days and has a layered structure that has evolved gradually since the 1990s.

  • Tutorials. Half-day or full-day sessions, usually held on the first day, that survey emerging subfields or methods.
  • Main conference. The core technical program runs for three to four days. Accepted papers are presented either as oral talks (a small fraction, typically 1 to 2 percent) or as posters at large evening sessions. At ICML 2025, oral presentations accounted for roughly the top 1 percent of submissions (108 papers), spotlight posters for 2.6 percent (313 papers), and standard posters for the remainder of the 3,260 accepted papers [9][10].
  • Keynote and invited talks. Senior researchers from academia and industry deliver plenary addresses on themes such as foundation models, learning theory, or AI safety.
  • Workshops. One- or two-day topical workshops, held on the days bracketing the main conference, focus on niche or emerging areas. Workshop papers are reviewed separately from the main track and are generally non-archival.
  • Position track. Introduced for ICML 2024, the position paper track invites submissions that argue for a particular stance on issues facing the machine learning community, including research priorities, ethics, governance, or methodology. Position submissions undergo double-blind peer review under criteria that emphasize whether the paper presents a compelling, well-supported perspective rather than novel empirical results [7]. The track was retained in 2025 and 2026.
  • Volunteer program. ICML offers a long-running volunteer program that provides registration discounts to graduate students who help with on-site logistics.
  • Affinity events. Groups such as Women in Machine Learning, LatinX in AI, Black in AI, and Queer in AI typically host affinity events alongside ICML.

Reviewing for the main track has been double-blind since the early 2010s. Different years have used different review platforms; recent editions have made use of OpenReview for portions of the review cycle, while submission and reviewer assignment have at times been managed through CMT (Microsoft's Conference Management Toolkit).

Locations and editions

The table below lists ICML editions from the 1980 founding workshop through the most recent meetings. Conference numbering follows the IMLS convention of counting from the 1980 IWML as the first edition [1].

YearEditionLocationCountry
19801st (IWML)Pittsburgh (CMU)United States
19832ndMonticello, IllinoisUnited States
19853rdSkytop, PennsylvaniaUnited States
19874thIrvine, CaliforniaUnited States
19885thAnn Arbor, MichiganUnited States
19929thAberdeenUnited Kingdom
199310thAmherst, MassachusettsUnited States
199613thBariItaly
199916thBledSlovenia
200118thWilliamstown, MassachusettsUnited States
200219thSydneyAustralia
200421stBanff, AlbertaCanada
200522ndBonnGermany
200825thHelsinkiFinland
200926thMontrealCanada
201027thHaifaIsrael
201128thBellevue, WashingtonUnited States
201229thEdinburghUnited Kingdom
201330thAtlanta, GeorgiaUnited States
201431stBeijingChina
201532ndLilleFrance
201633rdNew York CityUnited States
201734thSydneyAustralia
201835thStockholmSweden
201936thLong Beach, CaliforniaUnited States
202037thVienna (virtual due to COVID-19)Austria
202138thVienna (virtual)Austria
202239thBaltimore, MarylandUnited States
202340thHonolulu, HawaiiUnited States
202441stViennaAustria
202542ndVancouverCanada
202643rdSeoulSouth Korea

ICML 2014 in Beijing was the first time the conference was held in mainland China and marked an important step in broadening its geographic reach. The 2020 and 2021 editions were forced online by the COVID-19 pandemic. Both years are still nominally associated with Vienna, Austria, where they had been scheduled to take place; the conference returned to Vienna for an in-person meeting in 2024 [8].

When and where is ICML 2026?

ICML 2026 is the 43rd edition and is scheduled for July 6 to 11, 2026, at the COEX Convention and Exhibition Center in Seoul, South Korea, the first time the conference is held in South Korea [26][27]. The main paper submission deadline was January 28, 2026, with abstracts due January 23 [26]. In a May 2026 registration update, the organizers reported that the conference was "very close to capacity" and that general registration for the main conference was "expected to sell out," with a cap set "marginally below the legal limit for the venue" [28]. The position-paper track introduced in 2024 continued for the 2026 edition [26].

What were the ICML 2025 statistics?

ICML 2025, the 42nd edition, was held July 13 to 19, 2025, at the Vancouver Convention Centre in Vancouver, Canada [27]. It received 12,107 submissions and accepted 3,260 papers, a 26.9 percent acceptance rate, the largest submission count in the conference's history at that point [9][10]. Of the accepted papers, 108 (about 1 percent of all submissions) were selected as oral presentations and 313 (2.6 percent) as spotlight posters [9][10].

Submission volumes and acceptance rates

From the 1990s through the early 2010s, ICML typically saw a few hundred to roughly a thousand submissions per year, with acceptance rates hovering between 20 and 30 percent. The deep-learning era pushed those numbers sharply upward.

YearSubmissionsAcceptedAcceptance rate
20151,03727026 percent
20182,47362125 percent
20204,9901,08821.8 percent
20225,6301,23521.9 percent
20249,4732,60927.5 percent
202512,1073,26026.9 percent

These figures are sourced from official ICML statistics pages and the IMLS fact sheets where available [9][10][11]. The 2024 acceptance rate, around 27.5 percent, was unusually high relative to recent precedent, in part because that year saw an enlarged program committee and a deliberate increase in the number of accepted papers to absorb the growing submission load [11]. The 2024 program included 144 oral presentations and 191 spotlights among its accepted papers [11].

Awards

ICML presents two principal classes of awards each year: paper awards for outstanding work submitted to the current conference, and a Test of Time Award recognizing influential papers from a decade earlier. The terminology has shifted over time. Through 2018 ICML primarily used the label "Best Paper Award"; since 2019 the conference has often used "Outstanding Paper Award" for the same recognition, with Best Paper Award occasionally retained for top selections among the outstanding set. The two terms are used interchangeably in much community discussion.

Best Paper and Outstanding Paper awards

The table below summarizes selected paper award recipients across recent years. It is not exhaustive: most years select multiple papers and additional honorable mentions or runners-up.

YearPaperAuthorsAward
2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence FunctionsPang Wei Koh, Percy LiangBest Paper [12]
2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of SecurityAnish Athalye, Nicholas Carlini, David WagnerBest Paper [13]
2018Delayed Impact of Fair Machine LearningLydia Liu, Sarah Dean, Esther Rolf, Max Simchowitz, Moritz HardtBest Paper [13]
2019Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled RepresentationsFrancesco Locatello, Stefan Bauer, Mario Lucic, Gunnar Ratsch, Sylvain Gelly, Bernhard Schoelkopf, Olivier BachemBest Paper [14]
2019Rates of Convergence for Sparse Variational Gaussian Process RegressionDavid Burt, Carl Rasmussen, Mark van der WilkBest Paper [14]
2020On Learning Sets of Symmetric ElementsHaggai Maron, Or Litany, Gal Chechik, Ethan FetayaOutstanding Paper [15]
2020Tuning-free Plug-and-Play Proximal Algorithm for Inverse Imaging ProblemsKaixuan Wei, Angelica Aviles-Rivero, Jingwei Liang, Ying Fu, Carola-Bibiane Schoenlieb, Hua HuangOutstanding Paper [15]
2021Unbiased Gradient Estimation in Unrolled Computation Graphs with Persistent Evolution StrategiesPaul Vicol, Luke Metz, Jascha Sohl-DicksteinOutstanding Paper [16]
2022Stable Conformal Prediction SetsEugene NdiayeOutstanding Paper [17]
2022Causal Conceptions of Fairness and their ConsequencesHamed Nilforoshan, Johann Gaebler, Ravi Shroff, Sharad GoelOutstanding Paper [17]
2022G-Mixup: Graph Data Augmentation for Graph ClassificationXiaotian Han, Zhimeng Jiang, Ninghao Liu, Xia HuOutstanding Paper [17]
2023Learning-Rate-Free Learning by D-AdaptationAaron Defazio, Konstantin MishchenkoOutstanding Paper [18]
2023A Watermark for Large Language ModelsJohn Kirchenbauer, Jonas Geiping, Yuxin Wen, Jonathan Katz, Ian Miers, Tom GoldsteinOutstanding Paper [18]
2024Stealing Part of a Production Language ModelNicholas Carlini, Daniel Paleka, and othersBest Paper [19]
2024Genie: Generative Interactive EnvironmentsJake Bruce, Michael Dennis, Ashley Edwards, and othersBest Paper [19]
2024Discrete Diffusion Modeling by Estimating the Ratios of the Data DistributionAaron Lou, Chenlin Meng, Stefano ErmonBest Paper [19]
2024Position: Considerations for Differentially Private Learning with Large-Scale Public PretrainingFlorian Tramer, Gautam Kamath, Nicholas CarliniBest Paper (position track) [19]
2024Position: Measure Dataset Diversity, Don't Just Claim ItDora Zhao, Jerone Andrews, Orestis Papakyriakopoulos, Alice XiangBest Paper (position track) [19]
2024Debating with More Persuasive LLMs Leads to More Truthful AnswersAkbir Khan, John Hughes, and othersBest Paper [19]
2024VideoPoet: A Large Language Model for Zero-Shot Video GenerationDan Kondratyuk, Lijun Yu, and othersBest Paper [19]
2025CollabLLM: From Passive Responders to Active CollaboratorsShirley Wu, Michel Galley, Baolin Peng, and othersOutstanding Paper [20]
2025Train for the Worst, Plan for the BestJaeyeon Kim, Kulin Shah, Vasilis Kontonis, Sham Kakade, Sitan ChenOutstanding Paper [20]
2025Conformal Prediction as Bayesian QuadratureJake Snell, Thomas GriffithsOutstanding Paper [20]
2025The Value of Prediction in Identifying the Worst-OffUnai Fischer Abaigar, Christoph Kern, Juan PerdomoOutstanding Paper [20]

The 2024 awards drew particular attention because three of the recognized works fell under the new position-paper track (the differentially private pretraining and dataset-diversity papers being the most discussed), which gave the inaugural year of that track an immediate seal of legitimacy [7][19].

Test of Time Award

ICML introduced its Test of Time Award in 2009 with retrospective recognition of papers presented a decade earlier. The award was put on hold for several years and then restarted in 2017 in its current form, recognizing one paper from the conference held ten years prior that has had outstanding lasting impact. Recent recipients include the following.

Year givenPaperYear publishedAuthors
2017Combining Online and Offline Knowledge in UCT2007Sylvain Gelly, David Silver
2018A Unified Architecture for Natural Language Processing: Deep Neural Networks with Multitask Learning2008Ronan Collobert, Jason Weston
2019Online Dictionary Learning for Sparse Coding2009Julien Mairal, Francis Bach, Jean Ponce, Guillermo Sapiro
2020Gaussian Process Optimization in the Bandit Setting: No Regret and Experimental Design2010Niranjan Srinivas, Andreas Krause, Sham Kakade, Matthias Seeger
2021Bayesian Learning via Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics2011Max Welling, Yee Whye Teh
2022Poisoning Attacks Against Support Vector Machines2012Battista Biggio, Blaine Nelson, Pavel Laskov
2023Learning Fair Representations2013Rich Zemel, Yu Wu, Kevin Swersky, Toni Pitassi, Cynthia Dwork
2024DeCAF: A Deep Convolutional Activation Feature for Generic Visual Recognition2014Jeffrey Donahue, Yangqing Jia, Oriol Vinyals, Judy Hoffman, Ning Zhang, Eric Tzeng, Trevor Darrell
2025Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift2015Sergey Ioffe, Christian Szegedy

The selection of "Combining Online and Offline Knowledge in UCT" by Gelly and Silver in 2017 was widely viewed as fitting given the role that Monte Carlo tree search later played in deep reinforcement learning systems including AlphaGo. The 2025 recognition of Batch Normalization underlines how thoroughly that technique reshaped deep network training [21].

Notable papers

Many influential works in modern machine learning first appeared at ICML. Selected papers that genuinely originated at ICML and have proven highly influential include the following.

  • Stochastic Variational Inference (Hoffman, Blei, Wang, Paisley) appeared in JMLR Volume 14 in 2013. It generalized variational inference to large datasets and remains a workhorse method for scalable Bayesian inference [22].
  • Trust Region Policy Optimization (Schulman, Levine, Abbeel, Jordan, Moritz) was published at ICML 2015. TRPO provided a principled approach to policy gradient methods with monotonic improvement guarantees and was the direct precursor to Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) [23].
  • Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learning (Mnih, Badia, Mirza, Graves, Lillicrap, Harley, Silver, Kavukcuoglu) was published at ICML 2016. Better known as the A3C paper, it introduced the asynchronous advantage actor-critic framework that dominated deep reinforcement learning research for several years [24].
  • Batch Normalization (Ioffe, Szegedy) was published at ICML 2015 and won the 2025 Test of Time Award; the paper introduced one of the most widely deployed normalization techniques in deep learning [21].
  • Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functions (Koh, Liang) won the 2017 Best Paper Award and helped revive influence functions as a tool for interpretability and data attribution [12].
  • Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representations (Locatello and colleagues) won the 2019 Best Paper Award and showed that purely unsupervised disentanglement is impossible without inductive biases [14].
  • Stealing Part of a Production Language Model (Carlini and colleagues) won a 2024 Best Paper Award and was the first published model-extraction attack to recover non-trivial information from black-box production large language models [19].
  • Genie: Generative Interactive Environments (Bruce, Dennis, Edwards, Parker-Holder, and colleagues) won a 2024 Best Paper Award for demonstrating the first generative interactive environment trained from unlabeled internet videos [19].

It is worth noting which famous papers are commonly but incorrectly associated with ICML. The original AlexNet paper (Krizhevsky, Sutskever, Hinton, 2012) was at NeurIPS, not ICML. The first Generative Adversarial Networks paper (Goodfellow and colleagues, 2014) was at NeurIPS. The Adam optimizer paper (Kingma and Ba, 2015) was at ICLR. Word2vec (Mikolov and colleagues, 2013) appeared at ICLR and NeurIPS. The neural attention paper for machine translation (Bahdanau, Cho, Bengio, 2015) was at ICLR. The original AlphaGo paper appeared in Nature, not at any of the top ML conferences. The official PMLR proceedings and DBLP listings are authoritative for venue attribution.

Comparison with other ML conferences

ICML is one of three flagship conferences for machine learning research. The table below compares it with NeurIPS, ICLR, and other adjacent venues. Numbers are approximate and reflect recent multi-year averages.

ConferenceFoundedGovernanceScopeTypical submissionsTypical acceptance rate
ICML1980 (workshop), 1988 (conference)IMLSAll of machine learning9,000 to 12,00022 to 28 percent
NeurIPS1987NeurIPS FoundationML, neuroscience, statistics, applied probability12,000 to 17,00023 to 27 percent
ICLR2013Open Review (community)Representation learning, deep learning7,000 to 12,00027 to 32 percent
AAAI1980AAAIBroad AI including ML, KR, planning8,000 to 14,00020 to 25 percent
IJCAI1969IJCAIBroad AI4,000 to 7,00013 to 17 percent
CVPR1985 (formal)IEEE / CVFComputer vision9,000 to 13,00022 to 28 percent
ECCV1990ECVAComputer vision5,000 to 9,00025 to 30 percent
ICCV1987IEEE / CVFComputer vision7,000 to 12,00023 to 27 percent
ACL1962ACLComputational linguistics4,000 to 7,00020 to 25 percent
EMNLP1996ACL SIGDATNLP, empirical methods4,000 to 7,00020 to 25 percent
NAACL2000ACLNLP, North American chapter3,000 to 5,00022 to 28 percent

How does ICML differ from NeurIPS and ICLR?

A common point of confusion is the relationship between ICML and NeurIPS. Both are top-tier general machine learning conferences with substantial overlap in scope and authorship, but they are governed by entirely separate non-profit bodies. ICML is run by the IMLS, founded in 2001 to 2002, while NeurIPS is run by the Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation, which traces its origin to 1987. ICLR, first held in 2013, has historically focused more narrowly on representation learning and pioneered fully open peer review through OpenReview. In practice, ICML is typically held in July, NeurIPS in December, and ICLR in the spring, so the three flagship venues space the machine learning publishing calendar across the year.

Several trends have shaped ICML in the last several years.

  • Submission volumes and reviewer load. Submissions roughly tripled between 2018 and 2024 and continued to climb in 2025, reaching 12,107. Maintaining review quality at this scale has become a perennial concern, with each program committee struggling to recruit enough qualified reviewers and area chairs [9].
  • Surge in LLM and foundation model submissions. From 2022 onward, large language model and foundation-model topics came to dominate accepted papers, mirroring trends across NeurIPS and ICLR. Subtopics including alignment, evaluation, fine-tuning, retrieval-augmented generation, agents, and safety became major program tracks.
  • Position track. The 2024 introduction of a position-paper track was a deliberate attempt to give the community a venue for non-empirical arguments. The recognition of multiple position papers with Best Paper Awards in 2024 signaled that the IMLS intended the track to have substantive standing [7].
  • Reproducibility and code release. ICML expanded its reproducibility checklist initiative through the late 2010s, asking authors to disclose dataset preparation, training compute, and ablation details.
  • Reviewing platforms. ICML has moved between Microsoft CMT and OpenReview for various reviewing tasks, and recent years have experimented with reviewer rewards and stronger desk-rejection criteria.
  • Industrial sponsorship. Sponsorship from large industrial AI labs has become a substantial fraction of conference revenue, and recruiting events now rival the technical program in attendance for some attendees.
  • Capacity limits. As demand has outstripped venue space, ICML has begun capping registration. Ahead of the 2026 Seoul edition, organizers warned in May 2026 that the conference was "very close to capacity" and that general registration was "expected to sell out" [28].
  • Hybrid and virtual modes. After the fully virtual editions in 2020 and 2021, the conference settled into an in-person primary mode with virtual streaming and a virtual poster site for accessibility.

Criticisms

Like other top machine learning conferences, ICML has been the subject of recurring criticism from the community.

  • Acceptance-rate inflation and submission-volume strain. As submissions surge past the program committee's capacity to review carefully, reviewers see an increasing number of papers each, often with insufficient time. Critics argue that this leads to higher noise in accept and reject decisions.
  • Reviewer quality concerns. Reports of perfunctory reviews, factually wrong reviews, and reviewers who admit to not reading the paper appear regularly during ICML rebuttal seasons. Recent program chairs have responded with reviewer training, mandatory reviewer feedback, and in some cases reviewer disqualification policies.
  • Position-paper debates. The 2024 position-paper track sparked controversy over which kinds of arguments should be eligible for paper awards. Critics argued that judging position papers under blind peer review favors well-known authors with established credibility on contested topics.
  • Double-submission and deduplication policies. ICML, NeurIPS, and ICLR have overlapping deadlines and similar scope, leading to repeated debates about whether papers rejected at one venue should be permitted to be lightly revised and resubmitted to the next.
  • Fairness, ethics, and safety review. ICML introduced an ethics review process for papers raising potential societal harms in the late 2010s, and subsequent years have seen disagreement over how stringently it should be applied.
  • Award controversies. Specific award decisions have occasionally drawn pushback, including a 2023 public discussion in which a researcher argued that citation practices around an award-winning paper were uneven.
  • Travel costs and accessibility. As venues rotate among expensive convention centers and registration fees climb, attendees from less-resourced institutions report difficulty attending. The IMLS has expanded subsidies and travel-grant programs in response.

See also

References

  1. Wikipedia. "International Conference on Machine Learning." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Conference_on_Machine_Learning
  2. International Conference on Machine Learning. "About." https://icml.cc/About
  3. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research. https://proceedings.mlr.press/
  4. Machine Learning and Inference Laboratory, George Mason University. "Photos from Conferences." https://www.mli.gmu.edu/michalski/confphotos.html
  5. International Machine Learning Society. "About." https://machinelearning.org/
  6. Mooney, Raymond, and Dietterich, Thomas. "Starting an International Machine Learning Society (IMLS)." https://www.cs.utexas.edu/~ml/election/imls.html
  7. ICML 2024 Call for Position Papers. https://icml.cc/Conferences/2024/CallForPositionPapers
  8. ICML 2024 Conference. https://icml.cc/Conferences/2024
  9. ICML 2024 Fact Sheet. https://media.icml.cc/Conferences/ICML2024/ICML2024_Fact_Sheet.pdf
  10. Paper Copilot ICML Statistics. https://papercopilot.com/statistics/icml-statistics/
  11. ICML 2024 Conference page. https://icml.cc/Conferences/2024
  12. Koh, Pang Wei, and Liang, Percy. "Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functions." ICML 2017. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v70/koh17a.html
  13. ICML 2018 Awards. https://icml.cc/Conferences/2018/Awards
  14. ICML 2019 Awards. https://icml.cc/virtual/2019/awards_detail
  15. ICML 2020 Awards. https://icml.cc/Conferences/2020/Awards
  16. ICML 2021 Awards. https://icml.cc/virtual/2021/awards_detail
  17. ICML 2022 Awards. https://icml.cc/virtual/2022/awards_detail
  18. ICML 2023 Outstanding Paper Awards. https://icml.cc/Conferences/2023/Awards
  19. ICML 2024 Awards. https://icml.cc/virtual/2024/awards_detail
  20. ICML 2025 Awards. https://icml.cc/virtual/2025/awards_detail
  21. Ioffe, Sergey, and Szegedy, Christian. "Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift." ICML 2015. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v37/ioffe15.html
  22. Hoffman, Matthew D., Blei, David M., Wang, Chong, and Paisley, John. "Stochastic Variational Inference." Journal of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 14, 2013. https://jmlr.org/papers/v14/hoffman13a.html
  23. Schulman, John, Levine, Sergey, Abbeel, Pieter, Jordan, Michael, and Moritz, Philipp. "Trust Region Policy Optimization." ICML 2015. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v37/schulman15.html
  24. Mnih, Volodymyr, Badia, Adria, Mirza, Mehdi, Graves, Alex, Lillicrap, Timothy, Harley, Tim, Silver, David, and Kavukcuoglu, Koray. "Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learning." ICML 2016. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v48/mniha16.html
  25. DBLP entry for ICML. https://dblp.org/db/conf/icml/index.html
  26. ICML 2026 Call for Papers. https://icml.cc/Conferences/2026/CallForPapers
  27. ICML Future Meetings. https://icml.cc/Conferences/FutureMeetings
  28. ICML Blog. "ICML 2026 Registration Update: Capacity Limits and What Attendees Need to Know." May 24, 2026. https://blog.icml.cc/2026/05/24/icml-2026-registration-update-capacity-limits-and-what-attendees-need-to-know/

Improve this article

Add missing citations, update stale details, or suggest a clearer explanation. Every suggestion is reviewed for sourcing before it goes live.

2 revisions by 1 contributors · full history

Suggest edit