Corrections

When we get something substantively wrong, we fix it and log the fix here; small copyedits live in each article's revision history instead. Found an error? Use the "Report issue" button on the article (no account needed). So far we have received 2 reports and reviewed 1, taking a median of 4.8 days. 1 is waiting, the oldest since September 26, 2026. That is our record rather than a promise. See the verifiability policy for how checking works.

321 articles were corrected in the last 30 days. Every correction note and resolved report is listed below, newest first. A fix applied to several articles with the same note is shown once, listing each article; "See the change" opens that version in the article's revision history.

  1. editorial

    A study finding that contradicts the cited paper, the Rockwell acquisition date, university course platforms, the TurtleBot3 Friends list, and the TurtleBot 4 announcement sourcing

  2. editorial

    A CNY 10 billion gap given as CNY 1 billion, SuperPoD figures used for the SuperCluster, a 5-to-10-years claim absent from its citation, chip-volume figures in neither cited source, and sourcing for the Ascend 960DT date

  3. editorial

    Remove an unsourced AMD MI300 parity claim and an unsupported claim about the rate of new architecture support

  4. editorial

    Remove three uncited claims (an engine-spread attribution absent from the cited post, an sm_121 prediction written as fact, and a sweeping claim that three unrelated lines of work build on the FA3 codebase)

  5. editorial

    The Open LLM Leaderboard backend claim is past tense, an unsourced superlative removed, and a misattributed motivation

  6. editorial

    Invented throughput figures and claims attributed to sources that do not contain them, a stale current release, a pipeline-parallelism feature that does not exist, MXFP4 scope, FlashMLA day-one timing, and model-table errors

  7. editorial

    The FP8 ablation table had its two rows reversed and the conclusion drawn from them was backwards; register reallocation is dynamic; several figures re-sourced from the NeurIPS camera-ready rather than the PyTorch blog; FA4 and FlexAttention claims corrected; the FlashMLA inheritance claim reduced to what its README says

  8. editorial

    Link Gemini 3.1 Pro to its own page rather than the Gemini 3 article

  9. editorial

    The $18 billion Colossus figure is October 2025 reporting on Colossus 2, after Grok 4 was trained

  10. editorial

    Remove a vendor-sourced PwC comparison and an uncomparable hallucination-rate row

  11. editorial

    Remove an uncited sick-days claim from the enterprise-adoption block

  12. editorial

    The model card is a safety report with no architecture content, a self-refuting Opus 4 pricing comparison, wrong retirement slugs, an unshipped Grok 4 Code product with invented benchmark figures, and an uncited Colossus spend

  13. editorial

    Gemini 3.1 Pro has a 1M context window not 2M, plus fabricated attributions to Pichai and VentureBeat, the Windsurf licence described as an acquisition, wrong Priority pricing and several misattributed benchmark scores

  14. editorial

    Three benchmark figures are in the cited model card, reversed temperature guidance, a safe-rate figure not in Google's model card, and a contradictory MAU sentence

  15. editorial

    The lead stated the BMW deployment twice and in the company's voice; condense to one sentence attributed to the outlet, and attribute the positioning claim to the outlet rather than to Figure

  16. editorial

    Remove an uncited count of available MCP servers

  17. editorial

    Remove an unsourced IPO-window forecast, a net-worth sentence duplicated from a later section, and family details resting on a citation with no URL

  18. editorial

    Remove four claims that no cited source supports (a market-size forecast, a monthly production estimate, a 50,000-unit run-rate target and an operating-system row)

  19. editorial

    A fabricated attribution, agent list, usage figures resting on an unreadable source, competitor comparison rows, a reference that supports neither claim, and a mis-wired internal link

  20. editorial

    Install count, final release version, a misattributed account and quote, provider count, Cline codebase-indexing claim, Cursor MCP row, rating figures and dead references

  21. editorial

    A misquote, an unsourced customer list, wrong release dates and install and rating figures, a dead reference, and Roo Code shown as live after its May 2026 shutdown

  22. editorial

    Archer departure reason, industry count, Vettery date and an unsourced IPO-window forecast

  23. editorial

    The BMW engagement is a logistics sequencing demonstration per BMW and Figure, not a 40-unit body-shop and assembly contract; plus market-size, production, skills, quote and funding-round corrections

  24. editorial

    Point the Sierra links at the existing sierra_ai page

  25. editorial

    The Holistic Agent Leaderboard paper's first author is Sayash Kapoor